News & Press: IoDSA in the Press

State must play its hand carefully at SOEs

Thursday, 30 January 2020   (2 Comments)
Share |

Closing off the recent annual ANC lekgotla, President Ramaphosa warned against party leaders interfering with the boards of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This is a welcome statement given the extent of the crises at various SOEs, and the impact they are having on the economy, says Parmi Natesan, CEO of the Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA).

“One of the primary reasons for the state of our key SOEs is poor governance, with the lack of role clarity between shareholder and board a primary concern,” she says. “The President’s call provides a welcome opportunity for both SOE boards and Government as shareholder to reflect on their roles.”

In a recent paper, “Challenging facing public sector boards”, the IoDSA identified a lack of role clarity as one of the main issues affecting board performance. The paper states that “Many of the challenges around public sector board performance can be traced to overreach by the shareholder.”

As sole shareholder, Government is in a position to exert control over the board in a way that is virtually impossible in the private sector.

However, argues Dr Simo Lushaba, a Chartered Director co-author of the IoDSA’s paper, the shareholder would be well-advised to adopt best practice in the way it interacts with the board.

“The shareholder has to accept that it must balance its policy goals with the need to ensure that the SOE is governed effectively, and thus able to perform as desired. That means appointing people to the board who have the requisite professional and governance skills, as well as the integrity needed to provide ethical and effective leadership,” Dr Lushaba says. “It also means giving the board the space to exercise oversight of the executive and the company as a whole, without undue interference.”

The IoDSA advises the shareholder to take advice from the board when it comes to appointing new members, and conduct the nomination process in a highly transparent manner.

At a practical level, the IoDSA recommends that boards insist on a detailed Shareholder Compact that defines the role, responsibilities and authority of both shareholder and board. It is also desirable to retain the services of an independent governance expert to provide training.

“SOE boards must accept that they have a fiduciary responsibility to the organisation, not the shareholder who appointed them. They must push back when the shareholder encroaches on their rights or prerogatives,” Dr Lushaba concludes. “The consequences of allowing purely political considerations to override everything are there for all to see. SOEs are the nation’s crown jewels. As their shareholder, Government should put in place effective mechanisms to protect the independence of our SOEs, and uphold their good governance, in order to protect them from the undue exertion of political power by the shareholder and poor leadership from the directors. If they do not, we will never be able to bring ourselves back from the brink.”


Lomalanga V. Matsebula (Dlamini) says...
Posted Wednesday, 05 February 2020
Very enlightening views from Parmi and Dr Lushaba. The view that as sole shareholder, Government can exert control over the board better is true. But, it will take a lot of effort on the part of Government to instill a new culture change of: stop, reflect and adopt a new leadership approach to give its SOE boards that level independence. The same shift approach on the part of the appointed boards will have to apply. Naturally, Shareholder appointed boards may find it easier to satisfy the Shareholder at the expense of acting in the best interest of the organisation. Pushing back as suggested by Dr Lushaba is only possible with continuously trained and evaluated boards by independent Institutes such as the IoDSA . As soon as solid trust relations between the Shareholder and the boards are established, SOEs can perform at their maximum potential. The current publicity being focused on SOE boards is not good at all. It would seem that people will not raise their hands when approached.
Anthony F. Julies says...
Posted Tuesday, 04 February 2020
I am in total agreement with this view. Board members must also appreciate the macro socio- economic dynamics and sector-specific priorities and how these impact the sustainability of the businesses over which they have fiduciary responsibilities. This requires an integrated and appropriately sequenced action plan over a multi-year period with clearly defined deliverables. Boards must then be held responsible for the effective delivery of strategic plans and delegate accountability as and where appropriate. The “buck” always stops with the Board.